Recalibrating The Bench: A Case Comment On All India Judges Association V. Union Of India (2025)
- IJLLR Journal
- Jul 10
- 1 min read
Bhagyashri Premlal Jawarkar, Government Law College, Churchgate
ABSTRACT
This case comment critically examines the Supreme Court’s 2025 judgment in All India Judges Association v. Union of India, which reinstated the mandatory three-year Bar practice requirement for entry into the Civil Judge (Junior Division) cadre. The Court also restructured the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) quota and introduced suitability tests for promotions. This decision marks a significant shift in judicial recruitment policy, aiming to enhance the quality and maturity of the subordinate judiciary. While the judgment aligns with constitutional principles and global best practices, it also raises concerns about access, diversity, and the practical challenges faced by fresh law graduates. This comment explores the legal reasoning, policy implications, and potential reforms needed to balance competence with inclusivity.
Keywords: Judicial Service, Bar Practice, Article 233, LDCE, Subordinate Judiciary
