top of page

Revisiting The Conflict Between The Right To Environment And Right To Development

Revisiting The Conflict Between The Right To Environment And Right To Development In Light Of Judicial Decisions




Abhishek Charan, Alliance School of Law, Alliance University, Bangalore

ABSTRACT

This paper analyzes the relationship between the right to development and the right to environment. The paper analyzes the major Supreme Court judgments in this past decade on the conflict of these two rights. We can say that both of these two rights are two sides of a same coin. However, the problem arises in balancing these two rights. In this paper, the approach of the Supreme Court is analyzed and is found that the cases can be grouped into pro-environment and pro-development. The right to development has to be exercised or given effect to in such a manner as to ensure environmentally sustainable development. Sustainable development comprises of three elements- economic, social and environmental. Social impact has to be considered and given importance as it will strike a balance between right to development and environment.

Keywords: Right to environment, right to development, sustainable development, social impact and Supreme Court.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page