top of page

Right To Vote For Prisoners: A Public Survey Report




Mr. Ayush Kumar Singh, Amity Law School, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus

Dr. Jyotsna Singh, Amity Law School, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus


1. Introduction


The right to vote, often described as Universal Adult Franchise, has long been regarded as one of the most fundamental and perhaps the most defining features of a democratic system. At its core, democracy is built on the idea of popular participation in governance. This notion was famously articulated by Cleisthenes, who understood democracy as the “rule of the people,” a principle that found its earliest organised expression during the period of Athenian democracy between 508 and 322 BCE. Although many historians classify Athenian democracy as a pre- modern form of democracy, it remains significant for its practice of direct democratic participation, where citizens themselves deliberated and decided policy matters in public assemblies through voting and active engagement in civic institutions. While Athenian democracy represents the earliest well documented instance in which voting emerged as a central political practice, the idea of collective decision-making predates classical Greece. Long before formal states or written constitutions came into existence, early human societies relied on communal consensus when humans transitioned from isolated, forest-dwelling lifestyles to organised tribal communities. In such groups, decisions affecting survival such as hunting, movement, or conflict were often taken collectively, laying the foundations for what may be described as proto-voting practices. Over time, voting gradually transformed from an informal social practice into a recognised political right. This right came to be associated with representation in governance, whether exercised directly or through elected representatives. However, the entitlement to vote was rarely universal. Eligibility was frequently restricted on the basis of factors such as property ownership, gender, age, or social status, and these exclusions reflected the prevailing social values, political ideologies, and power structures of different historical periods. As awareness, social movements, and political activism evolved, these limitations were repeatedly challenged and, in many cases, dismantled.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page