top of page

Seat And Venue Conundrum




Muskan Mittal, O.P. Jindal Global University

ABSTRACT

Seat and Venue of Arbitration poses a lot of confusion and a state of chaos when one doesn’t understand the difference between the two and the possibility of overlapping of the two concepts. The location at which the proceedings are conducted is deemed to be the venue. A seat provides anchorage to the arbitration proceedings and submits the parties to the jurisdiction of courts of the location where the seat is1. If the proceedings are conducted at a place where seat is located, seat and venue overlap. If a seat is not determined, then venue does not automatically gain the status of seat, or does it? The courts are confused in this respect. The paper attempts to highlight the conundrum between seat and venue and the confusion furthered by the A&C Act.

Keywords: seat, place, venue, jurisdiction, arbitration, proceedings

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page