top of page

The Evolution And Codification Of Lex Mercatoria In Modern International Arbitration Frameworks: A Critical Analysis Of Recognition And Enforcement Mechanisms




Jinesh M, Assistant Professor (Law), School of Law (VISTAS), Chennai


ABSTRACT


The historical evolution and current use of lex mercatoria in international commercial arbitration frameworks are examined in this research paper. From medieval trading practices to its current form as a transnational legal order that coexists with national legal systems, it charts the development of merchant law. The UNIDROIT Principles, the UNCITRAL Model Law, and the New York Convention are the main subjects of the study's critical analysis of how much lex mercatoria has been acknowledged, codified, and incorporated into contemporary arbitration procedures. The study assesses the efficacy of enforcement mechanisms when arbitral decisions are based on transnational commercial principles rather than national law by comparing jurisdictional approaches across civil and common law traditions.

The results show enduring conflicts between national courts' sovereignty concerns during enforcement proceedings and the autonomy demanded by lex mercatoria proponents. By offering a framework for comprehending how non-state norms acquire legitimacy in the increasingly complicated field of international commercial dispute resolution, the study adds to the conversation on legal pluralism.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page