The Intersection Between Law And Science: A Study Of Evidentiary And Investigative Frameworks
- IJLLR Journal
- 1 day ago
- 1 min read
Justin P. Jacob, Symbiosis Law School, Pune
ABSTRACT
This paper considers comparative methodologies and processes of judicial and scientific evidence, regarding their roles in establishing facts and deriving conclusions. It identifies inherent biases and limitations within the process of judicial inquiries through a critical analysis and finds them diametrically opposite to the objectivity of scientific methods. The principle of 'AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM' is considered in both contexts, pointing out differences in its application. The study also goes on to explore the possibility of integration of scientific methods into the judiciary process for better accuracy and fairness. Focusing on how scientific evidence has been used in the past, as well as presently, by the Indian judicial system in reaching decisions, it suggests ways of enriching the process of judgment by integrating scientific inquiry. This work seeks to close the divide that separates law from science and thus precipitate a more informed and fair judiciary.
