top of page

The Jurisprudence Of Private Defence In India: Codification, Judicial Precedents, And Contemporary Shifts

56 minutes ago
1 min read



Shubham Kumbhar, Student of Law, Haveli Institute of Legal Studies & Research, Silvassa, Dadra & Nagar Haveli


ABSTRACT


This article critically examines the normative and operational framework of the right of private defence in India, tracing its codification from Sections 96–106 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, to Sections 34–44 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. The analysis focuses on necessity, reasonable apprehension, limits on defensive force, and the evidentiary burden applicable to a plea of private defence. It argues that the BNS substantially carries forward the IPC architecture while relocating the doctrine within the post-2023 statutory framework. The article also considers contemporary questions concerning domestic violence, cumulative abuse, and the classification of mutual confrontations as “free fights.”


Keywords: Right of Private Defence; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Proportionality; Golden Scale Principle; Preponderance of Probabilities; Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; Battered Woman Syndrome; Criminal Justification.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page