top of page

Tracing Due Process In Article 21 And A Case For Hierarchy In Fundamental Rights




Pragya Chauhan, LLB (Hons), NLSIU, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India BA (H) Political Science, Miranda House, University of Delhi, Delhi, India


ABSTRACT


This paper investigates the extent to which the doctrine of ‘due process of law’—originally excluded by the framers of the Indian Constitution—has been judicially incorporated into its framework. It argues that both procedural and substantive due process have been read into Article 21 by the judiciary, particularly following the landmark decision in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India. Later, the paper highlights the emergence of a hierarchy among fundamental rights in India. While rights under Article 21 are protected, they do not receive the same level of judicial scrutiny as those under Article 19. This has led to a differentiation in the protection of rights, with some rights subject to more rigorous judicial review than others.


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page