Anil Punj, Ph.D. (Law) Scholar, Manav Rachna University
Introduction
The Researcher through this paper argues that comparative constitutional law research through the lens of sociology of law is mainly about comparing national legal systems, even if Globalization, Europeanization, and increasing recognition of non-State law, such as customary law, religious law is challenging the very idea of ‘legal system’ regarding India, UK & USA.
A better understanding of different countries political and legal systems is facilitated by studying their political and legal systems. The duties of a modern political system, such as legislation, administration, and adjudication, are practically comparable everywhere.1 It is important to remember that "Comparative Law" is not a principle or set of rules of law, but rather a method or technique for studying law, or any breach or topic of it, arising from the diversity of legal systems around the world and the various approaches taken to common problems, by comparing attitudes, institutions, or rules in any two or more legal systems on any subject.2 Thus countries around the world compare their national legal systems with the other countries to see whether they are moving in the right direction or do they need to reconsider their approach towards a more progressive national legal system.
