top of page

A Critical And Empirical Study Of The Right To Information Act, 2005, Its 2019 And 2023 Amendments, And Its Institutional Performance In India

8 minutes ago
2 min read



Lakshya Raj Singh Ranawat, Independent Legal Researcher



ABSTRACT


Citizens in a democracy can only hold their government accountable if they know what it is doing. The Right to Information Act, 2005 gives Indian citizens a legal route to information held by public authorities, and this paper examines how that right took shape, how it has been used, and where it now stands after two significant legislative amendments.


The paper traces the RTI movement’s history in India, the court decisions that built its constitutional foundation, the Act’s key provisions, and the practical process for filing a request. It critically examines the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the 2023 amendment to Section 8(1)(j) introduced through the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, and asks whether these changes have weakened the institutional independence and disclosure mandate the original Act was built on. Drawing on recent Central Information Commission and Satark Nagrik Sangathan data (2019–2025), it also assesses the Act’s practical performance application volumes, pendency, and enforcement against its statutory design.


The RTI Act has undeniably opened up Indian governance in ways that were not possible before 2005. But its record is uneven. Pendency across Indian Information Commissions has risen sharply over the same period in which the 2019 amendment took effect, and the 2023 amendment to the personal- information exemption has narrowed what can be disclosed at the same time. This paper argues that the timing and direction of these amendments are consistent with though not, on the present data, conclusive proof of a compounding of pre-existing implementation problems, rather than a resolution of them. Closing the resulting gap will require both administrative reform and a legislative course correction, not further dilution of the disclosure mandate.


Keywords: Right to Information; RTI Act, 2005; Transparency; Accountability; Information Commission; RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019; Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023; Governance; Corruption; India; Article 19(1)(a).



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page