top of page

AI Regulations For The State: Flexible Or Invasive?

8 minutes ago
1 min read




Mudita Gupta, B.A. LL.B., Jindal Global Law School


ABSTRACT


As India rapidly adopts AI for State functions such as facial recognition, surveillance and predictive policing, the legal framework governing these technologies remains inadequate in terms of personal data protection. The new Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 remains silent on the use of AI by the State in processing personal data. This paper’s core concern lies in the broad exemptions provided by the Act to the State in the disguise of “certain legitimate uses.” As per this, the Act allows government agencies to bypass fundamental notice and consent requirements in the name of sovereignty and public order. This leaves room for serious misuse and a large difference from the provisions the Act seeks to enforce on the private sectors, then from the public. Furthermore, the Act fails to provide citizens with any kind of redressal mechanisms against ambiguous algorithmic decisions, as a result of using FRT, predictive policing, etc. Finally, the paper presents recommendations to prevent these issues and to ensure that India’s digital transformation does not come at the cost of fundamental rights.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page