top of page

Case Analysis: Patel Ravjibhai Bhulabhai V. Rahemanbhai M. Shaikh & Ors




Sweta Shoumya R R, BBA LLB (Hons.), School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University)

ABSTRACT

Property disputes make up a huge chuck of the cases filed in courts at any level. In the recent past, the apex court has reaffirmed the precedents of the current case and has explained the difference between a ‘mortgage by conditional sale’ and a ‘sale with option to repurchase’.

Title – Patel Ravjibhai Bhulabhai (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Rahemanbhai M. Shaikh (D) Thr. Lr. & Ors


Bench and quorum – Division bench consisting of Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Prafulla C. Pant

Procedural history:

The current appeal is directed against the judgement passed by the High Court of Gujarat where the court had previously reversed the judgements given by the two courts below.

Facts:

The respondents in this appeal were the original plaintiffs, namely, Shaikh Rahemanbhai Mohamadbhai (since died) and Shaikh Ismailbhai Mohamadbhai, before the trial court. They had executed a deed in favour of the original defendants, now appellants, Patel Ravjibhai Bhulabhai (since died) and Patel Dahyabhai Bhulabhai. This deed was titled as ‘conditional sale’.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page