top of page

Dignity, Consent, And Criminalisation: A Human Rights Perspective On Sex Work In India




Bhumika Gupta, Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU


ABSTRACT


The debate over sex work in India lies at the intersection of morality, human rights, and constitutional liberty. While the Indian Constitution guarantees equality, dignity, and personal autonomy under Articles 14, 19, and 21, the legal framework governing sex work- primarily the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITPA) continues to criminalize aspects of the profession, leading to systemic abuse, police violence, and social exclusion. This paper re-evaluates the legal and human rights status of sex workers in India through the lens of dignity, consent, and decriminalization. Drawing upon landmark judgments such as Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal and Gaurav Jain v. Union of India, international human rights instruments like CEDAW, and comparative models from New Zealand and the Netherlands, the paper argues that criminalisation undermines rather than protects womens rights. It advocates for a rights-based approach that recognizes sex work as legitimate labor, ensuring the protection, agency, and dignity of those involved.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page