top of page

Doctrine Of Precedent: A Comparative Analysis





Mehak Mahapatra, Student at Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad


ABSTRACT


The human brain seeks stability and consistency in life and tends to solve similar problems in a similar manner. Courts in India and all over the world, use the Doctrine of Precedent in the same way. The doctrine of precedent states that cases having similar facts and circumstances should have similar judgments and the same built upon the concept of stare decisis. This method has been widely made use of in various parts of the world and helps with limiting the waste of time while making sure each and every individual is treated and given justice equally. The concept of doctrine of precedent has been laid down under the provision of article 141 of Constitution of India. The author seeks to provide its readers with a comprehensive view of judicial precedent while discussing the theoretical premise of the same. The paper would analyse the concept and theories that stand as pillars for this doctrine, it’s importance and work in the Indian Constitution. Further, it shall discuss the doctrine of precedent in the UK and the USA.


Keywords: Doctrine of Precedent, Stare Decisis, Ratio Decidendi, Obiter Dictum, Article 141

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page