top of page

From Magna Carta To Article 21: Evolution And Challenges Of Bail Jurisprudence In India

Jun 19
2 min read



Atul Kumar, Pre-PhD Scholar, Faculty of Law, Soban Singh Jeena University, Almora

Prof. (Dr.) DK Bhatt, Research Guide & Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, Soban Singh Jeena University, Almora.


ABSTRACT


Bail jurisprudence in India reflects a persistent constitutional tension between individual liberty and state power. Rooted in the Magna Carta’s (1215) guarantee against arbitrary detention and crystallized in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the right to bail has evolved through extensive judicial interpretation. This paper traces that doctrinal trajectory from historic common law protections to contemporary statutory applications. It examines foundational judicial precedents including Balchand, Gudikanti Narasimhulu, and Hussainara Khatoon, culminating in the Supreme Court’s systemic directives in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022).


The paper provides a granular analysis of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), focusing on the practical and operational shifts introduced by Sections 479, 480, and 482. It evaluates how the "first-time offender" concession under Section 479 is modified by the multi-case exclusion in Section 479(2), and critiques how the expanded parameters of police custody under Section 187 complicate regular bail applications under Section 480.


Integrating recent 2026 apex court decisions, including Syed Iftikhar Andrabi v. NIA, alongside the ongoing litigation in Gulafsha Fatima v. State and Taslim Ahemad v. State, the study highlights contemporary institutional challenges: structural trial delays, the erosion of predictable judicial discretion, and the high statutory thresholds imposed by special legislations like the PMLA and UAPA. Backed by National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) prison statistics and Law Commission recommendations, this paper evaluates comparative Anglo-American pretrial risk models and proposes systemic legal, procedural, and technological reforms necessary to realign India's bail administration with the core mandate of Article 21.


Keywords: Bail, Personal Liberty, Article 21, BNSS 2023, Undertrial Prisoners, Criminal Procedure, Constitutional Law, Presumption of Innocence.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page