Goa Civil Code: An Evident Hoax To Uniformity And Gender Equity In Goa

Advait Shah, Jindal Global Law School

Introduction and Historical background

The uniform civil code that is currently governing the state of Goa is held in high regards by well-renounced people in the field of law. According to the chief justice of India, S.A. Bobde, Goa is a shining example of an Indian state with UCC. But the ground reality is different from what it is claimed. The experience of people being governed by it tells us that it is neither uniform nor progressive. An urgent need for UCC in family law was acknowledged in the pre-independence era, by the all India Women Congress who raised the issue of unequal treatment of women within various personal laws and demanded a reform through comprehensive code or reforms in the personal laws. But during the constitutional assembly debates, UCC was looked at from the point of view of national integration rather than gender justice.1 One of the arguments against UCC is that it is violative of one’s fundamental rights. One may want to be governed by their religious laws and hence many socialists, religious fundamentalists and political parties have also suggested retaining the personal laws as well. Another major argument and probably the most controversial one is by those who are aware of UCC in Goa and have argued that this code has improved the social status of women in Goa.2 There is no denying that there was the upliftment of women morals, but there persist various aspects where it lacks which we will discuss in this paper.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo


​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.