top of page

IRAC Analysis Of Regina Begum V. State Of Assam And Ors. – A Constitutional Perspective Of Polygamy

IRAC Analysis Of Regina Begum V. State Of Assam And Ors. – A Constitutional Perspective Of Polygamy And Freedom Of Religion In India






Sheersh Dhodi, Symbiosis Law School, Pune


BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI

(Before Michael Zothankuma, J.)

Petitioner:

Rejina Begum

V.

Respondents:

State of Assam and Ors.

Decided on July 26, 2017


CASE FACTS


The facts of the case are such that the petitioner, Rejina Begum is the first wife of Bulmajan Ali, a tractor driver in the Irrigation Department under the government of Assam, who died on duty in 2010. The petitioner filed for family pension, but the state (one of the respondents) refused to provide pension to the petitioner in view of the fact that respondent no. 6 (the second wife of Bulmajan Ali) has also filed for family pension, owing to the petitioner filing a petition to be awarded family pension. Rejina Begum has one child with her late husband, while respondent no. 6 has none. It was made clear in the judgement of the Court of the Munsif, Rangia that both the wives are legal wives of Bulmajan Ali.




Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page