Bhavna & Muskan, Maharishi Markandeshwar, Deemed to be University, Mullana, Ambala
ABSTRACT
Few laws that India's colonial government left behind have garnered the maximum amount dialogue as people who traumatize seditious offences. Since the country's independence, the law has been altered and construed to supply protections so it will stand up to constitutional review. However, it continues to be a great tool for limiting free expression and is often used by fashionable governments for motives that might be compared to those of our recent tyrannical leaders.1 In this research analysis, we tend to argue for the conclusion of the legislation of offense. it's argued that the legislation is ambiguous associated inaccurate by its own nature and can't be applied systematically through an analysis of however the law has been understood and applied by the courts even when it had been scan down in Kedar Nath v. Union of India. A post-independence democratically appointed government can't be certain by a legislation that was gone a colonial dictatorial authority for a particular reason. The High Courts and Supreme Court's offense cases is analysed to demonstrate however passee the crime of offense is changing into. Public order problems that the law is meant to unravel may instead be handled by different laws that has been enacted for that specific purpose.
