Athique Inam, Christ University
ABSTRACT
Euthanasia, the deliberate act of ending one's life to relieve unbearable suffering, is a topic that elicits profound ethical, legal, and societal considerations. This research paper embarks on a comprehensive comparative analysis of the regulatory frameworks, cultural contexts, and ethical dimensions surrounding euthanasia in three diverse countries: India, the Netherlands, and Australia. These countries exemplify varying perspectives on euthanasia, encapsulating a wide spectrum of attitudes, legislation, and healthcare practices. Our study delves into the historical evolution of euthanasia laws in each nation, scrutinizing the pivotal moments that shaped their current legal landscapes. We explore the role of healthcare professionals in end-of-life decision-making, examining their ethical obligations and the extent to which their involvement is sanctioned by the law. Patient autonomy, a cornerstone in the euthanasia debate, is investigated in depth to understand the empowerment of individuals in making life- ending choices. We also delve into the complex web of societal attitudes and cultural beliefs that influence how euthanasia is perceived and debated within these nations. By comparing and contrasting the similarities and differences in euthanasia practices and legislation across India, the Netherlands, and Australia, our paper aims to offer a nuanced understanding of the global landscape of end-of-life choices. This analysis combines legal, medical, and ethical perspectives to provide a comprehensive overview of the subject matter, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities presented by euthanasia laws across diverse cultural contexts. It underscores the evolving discourse on this sensitive issue and the influence of global trends on shaping national policies.
Keywords: Assisted suicide, cultural context, euthanasia, patient autonomy
