top of page

Strengthening Insurance Integrity: Regulatory Challenges, And Fraud Prevention In A Global Context




Arushi Dixit, National Forensic Sciences University


Introduction


Parties entering into a contract have a fundamental obligation to act in good faith towards each other, demonstrating fairness and honesty in their dealings. However, there's no explicit, predefined duty to act in a certain way. Insurance contracts, though legally binding agreements, are unique. They hinge on the principle of Utmost Good Faith, or “uberrimae fidei”. This means both the insurer and the insured must act with complete honesty. The insurer, in particular, accepts the responsibility of covering the insured's future losses.


The foundation of an insurance contract rests upon the insured's detailed account of the facts. This is the primary method for the insurer to assess and understand the potential risks involved, risks that the insured agrees to manage. The insurer, lacking firsthand knowledge of the insured's specific circumstances and the associated risks, relies heavily on this information. Consequently, the insured's commitment to truthfulness and transparency is paramount.


In insurance contracts, the duty of good faith is elevated above that of general contract law. Because the insurer is vulnerable to the insured's information, the insured must act with "utmost good faith." This means not only truthfully representing the present situation but also proactively disclosing any future events or changes that could influence the risk profile. Examples include informing the insurer of a new business venture that may increase liability or a change in health conditions that could impact life insurance. This ongoing disclosure ensures both parties operate with transparency throughout the policy's duration, allowing the insurer to manage risk effectively and the insured to maintain coverage.


Furthermore, as the law now exists, the obligation to disclose and act in good faith is ongoing and does not end when a policy is formed.


The Insurance Act of 1938, mirroring other colonial-era legislation, largely adopted British legal frameworks. A critical omission was the explicit definition of "insurance fraud." This oversight, coupled with the absence of specific deterrent measures like penalties and investigative powers, left a significant gap in protecting policyholders and the insurance industry.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page