top of page

The Plight Of Whistle Blower Policy In India




V. Anjana, BA.LL.B, LL.M., Jindal Global Law School

ABSTRACT

A thoughtful approach to whistleblowing promotes accountability, responsibility, and awareness. The Supreme Court of India has ruled that transparency in government operations is required and that concealment is unacceptable.1 However, the situation of whistleblowers in India has not been pleasant, and neither have the measures adopted to safeguard them. This dissertation examines how Indian case law and statutes have treated the idea of whistleblower considering the gaps. Additionally, examine the application of whistleblower policies by both public and private Sectors. In light of the fact that listed companies are no longer required to have a whistleblower policy, this dissertation uses a variety of surveys to investigate the nature and reach of whistleblower policies adopted by major Indian companies. It also details what qualities a whistleblower policy must have in order to be effective. At last, it presents a wider picture to address the issue of the statutes if including private and other unlisted companies to remedy the problem of whistleblower protection in India.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page