Divya Saini, BA. LLB (Hons.), Symbiosis Law School, Pune
ABSTRACT
From a deontological standpoint, this essay examines the moral benefits of passive euthanasia. To prevent prolonged suffering and protect a person's dignity, passive euthanasia includes withdrawing or delaying medical care. The author argues that granting people the freedom to terminate their suffering empowers them. What separates active euthanasia from passive euthanasia is emphasised, with passive euthanasia being backed because of worries about potential carelessness and bias in active euthanasia cases. Discussion of the moral conundrum surrounding passive euthanasia places a strong emphasis on the value of personal autonomy and dignity. The essay comes to the conclusion that because the deontological approach respects a person's right to make decisions regarding their own life, it may be argued that passive euthanasia is morally acceptable.
Comments