top of page

Tort Of Intentional Interference And Its Relation With Scarlett Johansson Vs Walt Disney Case




Niharika Singh, B.A.LL.B, Kirti P Mehta School Of Law

ABSTRACT

This research paper talks about the least talked tort which is tort of intentional interference which has generally evolved through various jurisprudence through time. The first jurisprudential breakthrough occurred in Lumley v. Gye in 1853 , while the core rules of tortious interference were eventually established in Greig v. Insole, where five key points were finalised for a case to be regarded as deliberate interference and then at the end we are going to discuss the reasons why Scarlett johansson chose both punitive and compensatory damages as compensation her lawyers mindset while filing the suit in los angeles in place of california and this case effect on other actors.

Keywords: Intentional Interference, jurisprudential, Breakthrough, core rules, Deliberate, Punitive, Compensatory Damages, Compensation and Mindset.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page