A Amarendar Reddy, Research Scholar, Pursuing Ph. D. (Law) - II Year (IV-Semester) from Mansarovar Global University, Sehore, Bhopal, Madhyapradesh, India & LL.M (Corporate Laws), M.A. (English), PG Diplomas in (Cyber Laws, Criminal Justice & Forensic Science, Mass Media Communication, Computer Applications)
ABSTRACT
In this Research Paper, an effort was made to enumerate and converse the future impacts of AI on ethical research in a common man career. As some scholars try to portray, the law is neither rocket science nor entirely repugnant of technology. Hence, ethical research in particular and in general, is amenable to and influenced by AI both positively and negatively. Moreover, it is evident from the study that the positive impacts of AI are far greater than its negative externalities, which are usually temporary and related to the disruptive effects of technology on the ethical point of view. Moment’s AI debates are searching for principles to govern arising and unborn technological systems for the common good. If the “good” involves upholding quality, also the transnational Human Rights system is fit for purpose. However, If AI researchers, developers, and contrivers work to cover and admire abecedarian Human Rights, they could open the path for broad social benefit. To disregard Human Rights would be to close off that path.
Of course, Human Rights have limitations. While transnational Human Rights law and principles cover a broad class of pitfalls and damages, they aren't equipped to address all of the known and unknown enterprises pertaining to AI. There will be cases where AI systems have negative social impacts that aren't identifiable or anticipated in terms of Human Rights. While the Human Rights systems are supported encyclopedically in deliberative bodies similar as the UN and have gained legality through the convention system and public laws, there are still numerous critics. The veritably terms “Human Rights” and “uality” have long histories replete with violent difficulties about their natural philosophical and political value. And reflecting on our current geopolitical moment, the gregarious UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has advised that the universal Human Rights system is under attack from super-patriotic nationalism that promotes tone- interest over the common good. Indeed if we bring Human Rights to the center of AI governance conversations, gaps would remain between Human Rights, principles, design and development, deployment, and operation.
Integrating any desirable value into a socio-technical system is a imperishable challenge. In substance, a Human Rights approach to AI would need to be completely integrated into the organizational surrounds of technologists, academics, and experimenters, as well as in the social surrounds of druggies. In doing so, we may also find that AI might impact the elaboration of Human Rights and quality in the future.
Keywords: Human Rights, Artificial Intelligence, Impact, Laws
