Arihant. V, School of Excellence in Law, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
“Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.”
ABSTRACT
Hindus and Muslims have a place with two distinctive religious philosophies, social traditions, and practices. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and surely they have a place with two distinct human advancements which depend for the most part on clashing thoughts and originations. Post- Independence, India has never been free from violent incidence assuming a communal character, particularly between Hindus and Muslims. The communal frenzy where the country is encompassed at present is an intelligent outcome of a whole decade-determined plot. The attack on masjid at Ayodhya was boorish no uncertainty; yet the genuine brutality lay in the countrywide festival of that demonstration. This fragment reconnoitres the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhumi debate by zeroing in on the legitimate and managerial inscription through which the Ayodhya question gains a daily existence in law. The law corresponding to the question is concerned more with the reclamation of the norm, and less with issues identified with equity, compensation and restoration. The status-quo turns into a title of legitimation open to pursuit from all sides to such an extent that particular lawful and authoritative procedures are at this point don't be conceivable without it.
Keywords: Hindus and Muslims, Communal character, Ayodhya, Babri Masjid, status-qua
