top of page

The Ghost In The Machine: Navigating The “Spiritual Sequel” In India’s IP Landscape




Ravinandini Singh Chauhan, The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS)


ABSTRACT


The case of Eros International v. Aanand L. Rai over Tere Ishk Mein highlights the shortcomings of Indian intellectual property law in protecting the commercial identity of films based on aesthetic similarities, wherein filmmakers create spiritual sequels to an older film without reproducing its characters or storyline. This is because of the inadequacies of the current framework, which focuses on the doctrine of idea-expression separation and the traditional concept of passing off for addressing cases involving the commercial use of another’s intellectual work. This paper reviews these shortcomings in copyright and passing off laws concerning the entertainment industry, identifies the resultant lacuna, and proposes a three-pronged test (Aesthetic Goodwill Test) as a judicial tool to distinguish creative homage from commercial appropriation.


Keywords: spiritual sequel, aesthetic goodwill, idea-expression dichotomy, passing off, trade dress, Eros International v. Aanand L. Rai, Indian copyright law, Trade Marks Act, 1999.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page