top of page

A Comparative Study Of India’s GST Regime With The Canadian GST Model

A Comparative Study Of India’s GST Regime With The Canadian GST Model With Special Emphasis On The Idea Of Fiscal Federalism




Mehul Mor, L.L.M in Corporate Law, Christ (Deemed to be) University

ABSTRACT

The Goods and Service Tax came into effect in India on 1st July 2017. The indirect tax regime was introduced as an improvement from the previous tax regime which had several taxes at multiple levels being introduced by the centre and state. All the previous taxes like VAT, Sales Tax, etc were removed and one tax point, i.e., tax on the sale of goods and services was introduced. This legal regime of indirect taxation was inspired by several countries one of them being Canada which had implemented its GST model in 1991 and has a rich legal history of the same since then. This research study is a comparative study between India’s GST Model and Canada’s GST model. While making a comparison between the two laws, concepts of federalism like fiscal federalism are used as legal instruments to get more clarity on the nature of the respective legislations. This paper has in detail focusing on the differences and similarities between the two legislations.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page